On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:53 PM Michael Walle wrote:
>
> Am 2020-05-26 23:45, schrieb Saravana Kannan:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:13 PM Michael Walle wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 2020-05-26 21:43, schrieb Saravana Kannan:
> >> > When SYNC_STATE_ONLY support was added in commit 05ef983e0d65 ("driver
> >
Am 2020-05-26 23:45, schrieb Saravana Kannan:
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:13 PM Michael Walle wrote:
Am 2020-05-26 21:43, schrieb Saravana Kannan:
> When SYNC_STATE_ONLY support was added in commit 05ef983e0d65 ("driver
> core: Add device link support for SYNC_STATE_ONLY flag"),
> SYNC_STATE_ONL
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:13 PM Michael Walle wrote:
>
> Am 2020-05-26 21:43, schrieb Saravana Kannan:
> > When SYNC_STATE_ONLY support was added in commit 05ef983e0d65 ("driver
> > core: Add device link support for SYNC_STATE_ONLY flag"),
> > SYNC_STATE_ONLY links were treated similar to STATELES
Am 2020-05-26 21:43, schrieb Saravana Kannan:
When SYNC_STATE_ONLY support was added in commit 05ef983e0d65 ("driver
core: Add device link support for SYNC_STATE_ONLY flag"),
SYNC_STATE_ONLY links were treated similar to STATELESS links in terms
of not blocking consumer probe if the supplier hasn
When SYNC_STATE_ONLY support was added in commit 05ef983e0d65 ("driver
core: Add device link support for SYNC_STATE_ONLY flag"),
SYNC_STATE_ONLY links were treated similar to STATELESS links in terms
of not blocking consumer probe if the supplier hasn't probed yet.
That caused a SYNC_STATE_ONLY de
5 matches
Mail list logo
