> On Mar 10, 2017, at 8:46 PM, zhouchengming wrote:
>
>> On 2017/3/10 23:12, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 03/08/2017 07:20 PM, Zhou Chengming wrote:
>>> When we activate policy on the request_queue, we will create policy_date
>>> for all the existing blkgs of the request_queue, so we should call
>>>
On 2017/3/10 23:12, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 03/08/2017 07:20 PM, Zhou Chengming wrote:
When we activate policy on the request_queue, we will create policy_date
for all the existing blkgs of the request_queue, so we should call
pd_init_fn() and pd_online_fn() on these newly created policy_data.
Sig
On 03/08/2017 07:20 PM, Zhou Chengming wrote:
> When we activate policy on the request_queue, we will create policy_date
> for all the existing blkgs of the request_queue, so we should call
> pd_init_fn() and pd_online_fn() on these newly created policy_data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhou Chengming
> -
Hi Zhou,
[auto build test ERROR on block/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.11-rc1 next-20170309]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Zhou-Chengming/don-t-forget-to-call-pd_online
When we activate policy on the request_queue, we will create policy_date
for all the existing blkgs of the request_queue, so we should call
pd_init_fn() and pd_online_fn() on these newly created policy_data.
Signed-off-by: Zhou Chengming
---
block/blk-cgroup.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 inser
5 matches
Mail list logo