Hello Daniel,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 06:52:39PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 03/25/2014 03:50 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >Wolfgang Sang pointed out that "efm32,$device" is non-standard. So use the
> >common scheme and prefix device with "efm32-". The old compatible string
> >is left in pl
On 03/25/2014 03:50 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Wolfgang Sang pointed out that "efm32,$device" is non-standard. So use the
common scheme and prefix device with "efm32-". The old compatible string
is left in place until arch/arm/boot/dts/efm32* is fixed.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König
Applied
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 03:50:44PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Wolfgang Sang pointed out that "efm32,$device" is non-standard. So use the
> common scheme and prefix device with "efm32-". The old compatible string
> is left in place until arch/arm/boot/dts/efm32* is fixed.
>
> Signed-off-by: U
Wolfgang Sang pointed out that "efm32,$device" is non-standard. So use the
common scheme and prefix device with "efm32-". The old compatible string
is left in place until arch/arm/boot/dts/efm32* is fixed.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König
---
Changes since (implicit) v1, sent with
Message-Id: 1395
4 matches
Mail list logo