; >
> > Your patch has style problems, please review.
> >
> > or:
> >
> > Your patch has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission.
>
> Showing the proposed "after patch" output would be helpful. It seems
> that it will be
>
&g
On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 22:40 +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Tuesday 05 May 2020 12:57:37 Joe Perches wrote:
> > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > > index eac40f0abd56a9f4..3355358697d9e790 100755
> > > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > > +++ b/scripts/checkpat
Hello!
On Tuesday 05 May 2020 12:57:37 Joe Perches wrote:
> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > index eac40f0abd56a9f4..3355358697d9e790 100755
> > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > @@ -1057,6 +1057,10 @@ for my $filename (@ARGV) {
> >
On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 15:26 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> While "git am" can apply an mbox file containing multiple patches (e.g.
> as created by b4[1], or a patch bundle downloaded from patchwork),
> checkpatch does not have proper support for that. When operating on an
> mbox, checkpatch wi
On Tue, 5 May 2020 15:26:13 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> While "git am" can apply an mbox file containing multiple patches (e.g.
> as created by b4[1], or a patch bundle downloaded from patchwork),
> checkpatch does not have proper support for that. When operating on an
> mbox, checkpatch
While "git am" can apply an mbox file containing multiple patches (e.g.
as created by b4[1], or a patch bundle downloaded from patchwork),
checkpatch does not have proper support for that. When operating on an
mbox, checkpatch will merge all detected tags, and complain falsely
about duplicates:
6 matches
Mail list logo
