On Friday, October 24, 2014 05:17:12 PM Imre Deak wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 16:04 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, October 24, 2014 10:59:09 AM Imre Deak wrote:
> > > Atm, if one of the dev_pm_ops::freeze callbacks fails during the QUIESCE
> > > phase we don't rollback things cor
On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 16:04 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, October 24, 2014 10:59:09 AM Imre Deak wrote:
> > Atm, if one of the dev_pm_ops::freeze callbacks fails during the QUIESCE
> > phase we don't rollback things correctly calling the thaw and complete
> > callbacks. This could le
On Friday, October 24, 2014 10:59:09 AM Imre Deak wrote:
> Atm, if one of the dev_pm_ops::freeze callbacks fails during the QUIESCE
> phase we don't rollback things correctly calling the thaw and complete
> callbacks. This could leave some devices in a suspended state in case of
> an error during r
Atm, if one of the dev_pm_ops::freeze callbacks fails during the QUIESCE
phase we don't rollback things correctly calling the thaw and complete
callbacks. This could leave some devices in a suspended state in case of
an error during resuming from hibernation.
Also if an asynchronous suspend_late o
4 matches
Mail list logo
