> Eessentially what you want to do is to detach and backup the original
> NVS resources and put them back to the list with insert_resource() when
> tpm_crb is removed. At least I think this is what should be done but you
> should CC your patch also to the ACPI list for feedback.
>
> /Jarkko
Yes, y
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 02:29:01PM +0900, Seunghun Han wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 03:00:06PM +0100, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 02:17:48PM +0900, Seunghun Han wrote:
> > > > Vanya,
> > > > I also made a patch series to solve AMD's fTPM. My patch link is here,
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 03:00:06PM +0100, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 02:17:48PM +0900, Seunghun Han wrote:
> > > Vanya,
> > > I also made a patch series to solve AMD's fTPM. My patch link is here,
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/9/132 .
> > >
> > > The maintainer, Jar
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 03:00:06PM +0100, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 02:17:48PM +0900, Seunghun Han wrote:
> > Vanya,
> > I also made a patch series to solve AMD's fTPM. My patch link is here,
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/9/132 .
> >
> > The maintainer, Jarkko, wanted me
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 02:17:48PM +0900, Seunghun Han wrote:
> Vanya,
> I also made a patch series to solve AMD's fTPM. My patch link is here,
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/9/132 .
>
> The maintainer, Jarkko, wanted me to remark on your patch, so I would
> like to cooperate with you.
>
> Your p
> > And why is this allocating memory inside the acpi table walker? It
> > seems to me like the memory should be allocated once the mapping is
> > made.
> >
>
> Yes, this looks bad. Letting the walker build the list and then using
> it is, probably, a better idea.
>
> > Maybe all the mappings shoul
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 01:42:42AM +0300, Vanya Lazeev wrote:
> fTPM on Zen+ not only needs multiple mappings, it can also return
> inconsistent with ACPI values for range sizes (as for me and
> mikajhe from the bug thread), so results of crb_containing_resource
> are also used to fix the inconsist
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:10:03AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 09:52:18PM +0300, ivan.laz...@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Vanya Lazeev
> >
> > The patch is an attempt to make fTPM on AMD Zen CPUs work.
> > Bug link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195657
> >
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 09:52:18PM +0300, ivan.laz...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Vanya Lazeev
>
> The patch is an attempt to make fTPM on AMD Zen CPUs work.
> Bug link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195657
>
> The problem seems to be that tpm_crb driver doesn't expect tpm command
> a
From: Vanya Lazeev
The patch is an attempt to make fTPM on AMD Zen CPUs work.
Bug link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195657
The problem seems to be that tpm_crb driver doesn't expect tpm command
and response memory regions to belong to different ACPI resources.
Tested on Asrock I
10 matches
Mail list logo