On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 12:25:17PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> Currently in sst_dsp_new() if we get an error return from sst_dma_new()
> we just print an error message and then still complete the function
> successfully. This means that we are trying to run without sst->dma
Please don't bury pat
On 4/29/19 1:25 PM, Ross Zwisler wrote:
Currently in sst_dsp_new() if we get an error return from sst_dma_new()
we just print an error message and then still complete the function
successfully. This means that we are trying to run without sst->dma
properly set up, which will result in NULL point
Currently in sst_dsp_new() if we get an error return from sst_dma_new()
we just print an error message and then still complete the function
successfully. This means that we are trying to run without sst->dma
properly set up, which will result in NULL pointer dereference when
sst->dma is later used
3 matches
Mail list logo
