Re: [PATCH v13 0/9] Per-user clock constraints

2014-09-26 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 09/26/14 16:20, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Tomeu Vizoso (2014-09-26 01:09:20) >> On 09/26/2014 03:29 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> >>> We already have the consumer/provider split in the struct clk_hw and >>> struct clk separation. Why don't we just use struct clk_hw throughout >>> the provider

Re: [PATCH v13 0/9] Per-user clock constraints

2014-09-26 Thread Mike Turquette
Quoting Tomeu Vizoso (2014-09-26 01:09:20) > On 09/26/2014 03:29 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 09/24/14 01:27, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> On 09/23/2014 10:59 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >>> > >>> Any thoughts on my comments on patch set #10[1]? It seems like we can > >>> avoid having a flag day to sup

Re: [PATCH v13 0/9] Per-user clock constraints

2014-09-26 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On 09/26/2014 03:29 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 09/24/14 01:27, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On 09/23/2014 10:59 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> >>> Any thoughts on my comments on patch set #10[1]? It seems like we can >>> avoid having a flag day to support this. >> I cannot say that I fully understand your

Re: [PATCH v13 0/9] Per-user clock constraints

2014-09-25 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 09/24/14 01:27, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On 09/23/2014 10:59 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> >> Any thoughts on my comments on patch set #10[1]? It seems like we can >> avoid having a flag day to support this. > I cannot say that I fully understand your proposal, but IMO the most > valuable thing in thi

Re: [PATCH v13 0/9] Per-user clock constraints

2014-09-24 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On 23 September 2014 20:40, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hello, > > this version of the patchset addresses some issues that Russell pointed out > yesterday: Just an update with the test build results from kbuild. I'm not sure about the timeouts, but it can be seen that allmodconfig succeeds for all arch

Re: [PATCH v13 0/9] Per-user clock constraints

2014-09-24 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On 09/23/2014 10:59 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 09/23/14 11:40, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> Hello, >> >> this version of the patchset addresses some issues that Russell pointed out >> yesterday: >> >> * Refactor the changes to clkdev.c to reduce the amount of ifdefs. >> >> * Properly release clocks whe

Re: [PATCH v13 0/9] Per-user clock constraints

2014-09-23 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 09/23/14 11:40, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hello, > > this version of the patchset addresses some issues that Russell pointed out > yesterday: > > * Refactor the changes to clkdev.c to reduce the amount of ifdefs. > > * Properly release clocks when there isn't enough memory to create the > per-user

[PATCH v13 0/9] Per-user clock constraints

2014-09-23 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hello, this version of the patchset addresses some issues that Russell pointed out yesterday: * Refactor the changes to clkdev.c to reduce the amount of ifdefs. * Properly release clocks when there isn't enough memory to create the per-user wrapper. * Add clk_provider_put(struct clk_core*) for