> > On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 19:35 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 06:26:03PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 07:23:12PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > What "real workload" test can be run on this to help show if it
> > > > > is useful or not? Thes
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 10:54:58AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 19:35 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 06:26:03PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 07:23:12PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > What "real workload" test can be run on
On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 19:35 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 06:26:03PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 07:23:12PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > What "real workload" test can be run on this to help show if it
> > > is useful or not? These vendors seem to th
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 07:35:03PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 06:26:03PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 07:23:12PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > What "real workload" test can be run on this to help show if it is
> > > useful or not? These vendors see
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 06:26:03PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 07:23:12PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > What "real workload" test can be run on this to help show if it is
> > useful or not? These vendors seem to think it helps for some reason,
> > otherwise they wouldn't
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 07:23:12PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> What "real workload" test can be run on this to help show if it is
> useful or not? These vendors seem to think it helps for some reason,
> otherwise they wouldn't have added it to their silicon :)
>
> Should they run fio? If so, any hin
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 06:06:55PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 06:56:23PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 01:40:21PM +0900, Daejun Park wrote:
> > > Changelog:
> > >
> > > v12 -> v13
> > > 1. Cleanup codes by comments from Can Guo.
> > > 2. Add HPB r
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 06:56:23PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 01:40:21PM +0900, Daejun Park wrote:
> > Changelog:
> >
> > v12 -> v13
> > 1. Cleanup codes by comments from Can Guo.
> > 2. Add HPB related descriptor/flag/attributes in sysfs.
> > 3. Change base commit from 5.10/s
On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 01:40:21PM +0900, Daejun Park wrote:
> Changelog:
>
> v12 -> v13
> 1. Cleanup codes by comments from Can Guo.
> 2. Add HPB related descriptor/flag/attributes in sysfs.
> 3. Change base commit from 5.10/scsi-queue to 5.11/scsi-queue.
What ever happened to this patchset? Di
On 2020-11-03 12:40, Daejun Park wrote:
Changelog:
v12 -> v13
1. Cleanup codes by comments from Can Guo.
2. Add HPB related descriptor/flag/attributes in sysfs.
3. Change base commit from 5.10/scsi-queue to 5.11/scsi-queue.
If you have changed the code based by comments left on Google gerrit,
Changelog:
v12 -> v13
1. Cleanup codes by comments from Can Guo.
2. Add HPB related descriptor/flag/attributes in sysfs.
3. Change base commit from 5.10/scsi-queue to 5.11/scsi-queue.
v11 -> v12
1. Fixed to return error value when HPB fails to initialize pinned active
region.
2. Fixed to disable
11 matches
Mail list logo
