在 2022/4/11 14:37, Christoph Hellwig 写道:
+ unmap_and_kill(&to_kill, pfn, page->mapping, page->index, flags);
+unlock:
+ dax_unlock_page(page, cookie);
+ return 0;
As the buildbot points out this should probably be a "return rc".
Yes, my mistake, when resolving the conflic
> + unmap_and_kill(&to_kill, pfn, page->mapping, page->index, flags);
> +unlock:
> + dax_unlock_page(page, cookie);
> + return 0;
As the buildbot points out this should probably be a "return rc".
Hi Shiyang,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on hnaz-mm/master]
[also build test WARNING on next-20220408]
[cannot apply to xfs-linux/for-next linus/master linux/master v5.18-rc1]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note
Hi Shiyang,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on hnaz-mm/master]
[also build test WARNING on next-20220408]
[cannot apply to xfs-linux/for-next linus/master linux/master v5.18-rc1]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note
memory_failure_dev_pagemap code is a bit complex before introduce RMAP
feature for fsdax. So it is needed to factor some helper functions to
simplify these code.
Signed-off-by: Shiyang Ruan
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams
---
mm/memory-fa
5 matches
Mail list logo