Re: [PATCH v12 09/11] spi: omap2-mcspi: convert to dma_request_slave_channel_compat()

2013-06-21 Thread Sourav Poddar
Hi Mark, On Friday 21 June 2013 04:58 PM, Mark Brown wrote: On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 04:07:51PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: We can resend the patch if you don't have it from the mailing list. I'll probably have it assuming it's been sent to some mailing list I read (the CC list here looks absurld

Re: [PATCH v12 09/11] spi: omap2-mcspi: convert to dma_request_slave_channel_compat()

2013-06-21 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 04:07:51PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: > We can resend the patch if you don't have it from the mailing list. I'll probably have it assuming it's been sent to some mailing list I read (the CC list here looks absurldy large...) but if you don't send me the patch and/or ignore

Re: [PATCH v12 09/11] spi: omap2-mcspi: convert to dma_request_slave_channel_compat()

2013-06-21 Thread Sekhar Nori
Fixing Mark's e-mail. Mark, On 6/21/2013 3:56 PM, Sourav Poddar wrote: > Hi Mark, > On Friday 21 June 2013 02:36 AM, Joel A Fernandes wrote: >> From: Matt Porter >> >> Convert dmaengine channel requests to use >> dma_request_slave_channel_compat(). This supports the DT case of >> platforms requi

Re: [PATCH v12 09/11] spi: omap2-mcspi: convert to dma_request_slave_channel_compat()

2013-06-21 Thread Sourav Poddar
Hi Mark, On Friday 21 June 2013 02:36 AM, Joel A Fernandes wrote: From: Matt Porter Convert dmaengine channel requests to use dma_request_slave_channel_compat(). This supports the DT case of platforms requiring channel selection from either the OMAP DMA or the EDMA engine. AM33xx only boots from

[PATCH v12 09/11] spi: omap2-mcspi: convert to dma_request_slave_channel_compat()

2013-06-20 Thread Joel A Fernandes
From: Matt Porter Convert dmaengine channel requests to use dma_request_slave_channel_compat(). This supports the DT case of platforms requiring channel selection from either the OMAP DMA or the EDMA engine. AM33xx only boots from DT and is the only user implementing EDMA so in the !DT case we ca