Hi Mark,
On Friday 21 June 2013 04:58 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 04:07:51PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
We can resend the patch if you don't have it from the mailing list.
I'll probably have it assuming it's been sent to some mailing list I
read (the CC list here looks absurld
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 04:07:51PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> We can resend the patch if you don't have it from the mailing list.
I'll probably have it assuming it's been sent to some mailing list I
read (the CC list here looks absurldy large...) but if you don't send me
the patch and/or ignore
Fixing Mark's e-mail.
Mark,
On 6/21/2013 3:56 PM, Sourav Poddar wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> On Friday 21 June 2013 02:36 AM, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
>> From: Matt Porter
>>
>> Convert dmaengine channel requests to use
>> dma_request_slave_channel_compat(). This supports the DT case of
>> platforms requi
Hi Mark,
On Friday 21 June 2013 02:36 AM, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
From: Matt Porter
Convert dmaengine channel requests to use
dma_request_slave_channel_compat(). This supports the DT case of
platforms requiring channel selection from either the OMAP DMA or
the EDMA engine. AM33xx only boots from
From: Matt Porter
Convert dmaengine channel requests to use
dma_request_slave_channel_compat(). This supports the DT case of
platforms requiring channel selection from either the OMAP DMA or
the EDMA engine. AM33xx only boots from DT and is the only user
implementing EDMA so in the !DT case we ca
5 matches
Mail list logo