On Thu, 2 Jan 2014, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 01/01/14 04:35, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > From: Mukesh Rathor
> >
> > .. which are surprinsingly small compared to the amount for PV code.
> >
> > PVH uses mostly native mmu ops, we leave the generic (native_*) for
> > the majority and just ove
On 03/01/14 01:36, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jan 2014 11:24:50 +
> David Vrabel wrote:
>
>> On 01/01/14 04:35, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> From: Mukesh Rathor
>>>
>>> .. which are surprinsingly small compared to the amount for PV code.
>>>
>>> PVH uses mostly native mmu ops, we l
On Thu, 2 Jan 2014 11:24:50 +
David Vrabel wrote:
> On 01/01/14 04:35, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > From: Mukesh Rathor
> >
> > .. which are surprinsingly small compared to the amount for PV code.
> >
> > PVH uses mostly native mmu ops, we leave the generic (native_*) for
> > the major
On 01/01/14 04:35, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> From: Mukesh Rathor
>
> .. which are surprinsingly small compared to the amount for PV code.
>
> PVH uses mostly native mmu ops, we leave the generic (native_*) for
> the majority and just overwrite the baremetal with the ones we need.
>
> We al
From: Mukesh Rathor
.. which are surprinsingly small compared to the amount for PV code.
PVH uses mostly native mmu ops, we leave the generic (native_*) for
the majority and just overwrite the baremetal with the ones we need.
We also optimize one - the TLB flush. The native operation would
need
5 matches
Mail list logo