On 03/14/2016 03:38 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:34:55 +0530
Pratyush Anand wrote:
Hi Pratyush,
On 13/03/2016:12:09:03 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 00:32:18 -0500
David Long wrote:
+pstate_check_t * const opcode_condition_checks[16] = {
+ __check_eq,
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:34:55 +0530
Pratyush Anand wrote:
Hi Pratyush,
> On 13/03/2016:12:09:03 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 00:32:18 -0500
> > David Long wrote:
> >
> > > +pstate_check_t * const opcode_condition_checks[16] = {
> > > + __check_eq, __check_ne, __check_cs, __ch
On 13/03/2016:12:09:03 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 00:32:18 -0500
> David Long wrote:
>
> > +pstate_check_t * const opcode_condition_checks[16] = {
> > + __check_eq, __check_ne, __check_cs, __check_cc,
> > + __check_mi, __check_pl, __check_vs, __check_vc,
> > + __check_hi,
On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 00:32:18 -0500
David Long wrote:
> From: "David A. Long"
>
> Cease using the arm32 arm_check_condition() function and replace it with
> a local version for use in deprecated instruction support on arm64. Also
> make the function table used by this available for future use by
From: "David A. Long"
Cease using the arm32 arm_check_condition() function and replace it with
a local version for use in deprecated instruction support on arm64. Also
make the function table used by this available for future use by kprobes
and/or uprobes.
This function is dervied from code writ
5 matches
Mail list logo