Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-28 Thread Grant Likely
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:38:43 + , Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:54:25AM +, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 11:24:11 AM Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:02:53PM +, Grant Likely wrote: > > > > On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:39:27 +00

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-26 Thread Lorenzo Pieralisi
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:02:53PM +, Grant Likely wrote: > On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:39:27 + > , Will Deacon > wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:17:27AM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:09:33AM +, Hanjun Guo wrote: > > > > On 2015/3/19 3:05, Will Deac

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 11:38:43 AM Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:54:25AM +, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 11:24:11 AM Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:02:53PM +, Grant Likely wrote: > > > > On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:39:27 +

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-25 Thread Will Deacon
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:54:25AM +, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 11:24:11 AM Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:02:53PM +, Grant Likely wrote: > > > On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:39:27 + , Will Deacon > > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 11:24:11 AM Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:02:53PM +, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:39:27 + , Will Deacon > > wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:17:27AM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > > > Not only that, Sudeep has a p

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-25 Thread Will Deacon
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:02:53PM +, Grant Likely wrote: > On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:39:27 + , Will Deacon > wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:17:27AM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > > Not only that, Sudeep has a patch to consolidate DT and ACPI SMP code, > > > I am working on it, I

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-24 Thread Grant Likely
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:39:27 + , Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:17:27AM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:09:33AM +, Hanjun Guo wrote: > > > On 2015/3/19 3:05, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:39:26PM +, Hanjun Guo wro

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-24 Thread Hanjun Guo
On 2015年03月24日 02:32, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Sat, 21 Mar 2015, Hanjun Guo wrote: +CC Parth Dixit, Stefano Stabellini. On 2015年03月21日 02:54, Will Deacon wrote: On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:09:33AM +, Hanjun Guo wrote: On 2015/3/19 3:05, Will Deacon wrote: If you can get that in place,

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-23 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2015/3/23 6:11, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Sunday, March 22, 2015 09:32:48 PM Julien Grall wrote: > >> On 22/03/2015 21:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> On Sunday, March 22, 2015 09:05:21 PM Julien Grall wrote: > Hello, > > On 21/03/

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-23 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015, Hanjun Guo wrote: > +CC Parth Dixit, Stefano Stabellini. > > On 2015年03月21日 02:54, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:09:33AM +, Hanjun Guo wrote: > > > On 2015/3/19 3:05, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > If you can get that in place, I'm not opposed to putting th

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-22 Thread Hanjun Guo
On 2015/3/23 6:11, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday, March 22, 2015 09:32:48 PM Julien Grall wrote: >> On 22/03/2015 21:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Sunday, March 22, 2015 09:05:21 PM Julien Grall wrote: Hello, On 21/03/2015 12:09, Naresh Bhat wrote: > From 268dc

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, March 22, 2015 09:32:48 PM Julien Grall wrote: > > On 22/03/2015 21:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Sunday, March 22, 2015 09:05:21 PM Julien Grall wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> On 21/03/2015 12:09, Naresh Bhat wrote: > >>> From 268dcdafa34a690e2f99c0784ca33a6d2352ecf5 Mon Sep

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-22 Thread Julien Grall
On 22/03/2015 21:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, March 22, 2015 09:05:21 PM Julien Grall wrote: Hello, On 21/03/2015 12:09, Naresh Bhat wrote: From 268dcdafa34a690e2f99c0784ca33a6d2352ecf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hanjun Guo mailto:hanjun@linaro.org>> Date:

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, March 22, 2015 09:05:21 PM Julien Grall wrote: > Hello, > > On 21/03/2015 12:09, Naresh Bhat wrote: > > From 268dcdafa34a690e2f99c0784ca33a6d2352ecf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Hanjun Guo mailto:hanjun@linaro.org>> > > Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 14:43:54 +0800 > >

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-22 Thread Julien Grall
Hello, On 21/03/2015 12:09, Naresh Bhat wrote: From 268dcdafa34a690e2f99c0784ca33a6d2352ecf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hanjun Guo mailto:hanjun@linaro.org>> Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 14:43:54 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] XEN / ACPI: Make XEN ACPI depend on X86 When ACPI is

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-21 Thread Hanjun Guo
On 2015/3/21 11:17, Hanjun Guo wrote: > +CC Parth Dixit, Stefano Stabellini. > > On 2015年03月21日 02:54, Will Deacon wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:09:33AM +, Hanjun Guo wrote: >>> On 2015/3/19 3:05, Will Deacon wrote: If you can get that in place, I'm not opposed to putting this into

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-20 Thread Hanjun Guo
+CC Parth Dixit, Stefano Stabellini. On 2015年03月21日 02:54, Will Deacon wrote: On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:09:33AM +, Hanjun Guo wrote: On 2015/3/19 3:05, Will Deacon wrote: If you can get that in place, I'm not opposed to putting this into linux-next ahead of the firmware summit in San Jose

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-20 Thread Will Deacon
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:09:33AM +, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2015/3/19 3:05, Will Deacon wrote: > > If you can get that in place, I'm not opposed to putting this into > > linux-next ahead of the firmware summit in San Jose next week. Note that > > this is not a commitment for 4.1, since I'm kee

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-20 Thread Mark Salter
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 20:39 +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > This patch set already tested on multi platforms: > - AMD Seattle board; > - Cavium Thunder board; > - Huawei D02 board; > - Qualcomm ARM64 platform For the whole series: Tested-by: Mark Salter on AMD Seattle and APM Mustang. -- To un

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-19 Thread Will Deacon
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:17:27AM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:09:33AM +, Hanjun Guo wrote: > > On 2015/3/19 3:05, Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:39:26PM +, Hanjun Guo wrote: > > >> This patch set already tested on multi platforms: > > >

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-19 Thread Lorenzo Pieralisi
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:09:33AM +, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2015/3/19 3:05, Will Deacon wrote: > > Hanjun, > > Hi Will, > > > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:39:26PM +, Hanjun Guo wrote: > >> This patch set already tested on multi platforms: > >> - AMD Seattle board; > >> - Cavium Thund

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-18 Thread Hanjun Guo
On 2015/3/19 3:05, Will Deacon wrote: > Hanjun, Hi Will, > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:39:26PM +, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> This patch set already tested on multi platforms: >> - AMD Seattle board; >> - Cavium Thunder board; >> - Huawei D02 board; >> - Qualcomm ARM64 platform >> >> This versi

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-18 Thread Will Deacon
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 07:05:09PM +, Will Deacon wrote: > (2) I believe Sudeep and Lorenzo have concerns about patch 13 (SMP init), > so I'm assuming there will be additional patches from them that are > required. Bah, getting ahead of myself. This is in fact patch *12* of the s

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-18 Thread Will Deacon
Hanjun, On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:39:26PM +, Hanjun Guo wrote: > This patch set already tested on multi platforms: > - AMD Seattle board; > - Cavium Thunder board; > - Huawei D02 board; > - Qualcomm ARM64 platform > > This version 10 patch set address some minor comments and collect ACKs

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-15 Thread Suthikulpanit, Suravee
On 3/12/15, 08:26, "Timur Tabi" wrote: >Hanjun Guo wrote: >> This patch set already tested on multi platforms: >> - AMD Seattle board; >> - Cavium Thunder board; >> - Huawei D02 board; >> - Qualcomm ARM64 platform >> >> This version 10 patch set address some minor comments and collect A

Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-12 Thread Timur Tabi
Hanjun Guo wrote: This patch set already tested on multi platforms: - AMD Seattle board; - Cavium Thunder board; - Huawei D02 board; - Qualcomm ARM64 platform This version 10 patch set address some minor comments and collect ACKs and Reviewed-bys for v9: - new Acks from Rafael, Olof,

[PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-03-11 Thread Hanjun Guo
This patch set already tested on multi platforms: - AMD Seattle board; - Cavium Thunder board; - Huawei D02 board; - Qualcomm ARM64 platform This version 10 patch set address some minor comments and collect ACKs and Reviewed-bys for v9: - new Acks from Rafael, Olof, Grant, Lorenzo - new way