On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:03:50AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > all this is about switching from array to rb_list for the --per-thread case,
> > which can be considered as a special use case.. how much do we suffer in
> > performance with new code? how about the "perf stat -I 100", would it scale
>
> all this is about switching from array to rb_list for the --per-thread case,
> which can be considered as a special use case.. how much do we suffer in
> performance with new code? how about the "perf stat -I 100", would it scale
> ok for extreme cases (many events in -e or -..)
rbtrees scal
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:43:40PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> In previous patches, we have reconstructed the code and let
> it not access the static variables directly.
>
> This patch removes these static variables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao
> ---
> tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c | 64
> +
In previous patches, we have reconstructed the code and let
it not access the static variables directly.
This patch removes these static variables.
Signed-off-by: Jin Yao
---
tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c | 64 ++-
tools/perf/util/stat.h| 1 +
2
4 matches
Mail list logo
