On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 07:48:54AM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Since u bring this up - I think we don't need the original SYNC and/or
> SMT thread schedule at all. The SYNC here is a historic relic at best
> and we can get rid of it per reasoning below:
>
> In UP context it is obviously useless,
+CC Peter.
On Saturday 31 October 2015 06:53 PM, Noam Camus wrote:
> From: Tal Zilcer
>
> In SMT system like we have the generic "sync" is not working with
> HW threads. The replacement is "schd.rw" instruction that is served
> as cpu barrier for HW threads.
> Signed-off-by: Noam Camus
> ---
>
From: Tal Zilcer
In SMT system like we have the generic "sync" is not working with
HW threads. The replacement is "schd.rw" instruction that is served
as cpu barrier for HW threads.
Signed-off-by: Noam Camus
---
arch/arc/kernel/ctx_sw.c |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deleti
3 matches
Mail list logo
