Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: Switch to use list_entry_is_head() helper

2022-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 05:36:20PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 4:50 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 01:04:23PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > Since we got list_entry_is_head() helper in the generic header, > > > we may switch the ACPI modul

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: Switch to use list_entry_is_head() helper

2022-03-02 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 4:50 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 01:04:23PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Since we got list_entry_is_head() helper in the generic header, > > we may switch the ACPI modules to use it. This eliminates the > > need in additional variable. In some

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: Switch to use list_entry_is_head() helper

2022-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 01:04:23PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Since we got list_entry_is_head() helper in the generic header, > we may switch the ACPI modules to use it. This eliminates the > need in additional variable. In some cases it reduces critical > sections as well. Besides the work r

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: Switch to use list_entry_is_head() helper

2022-02-11 Thread kernel test robot
Hi Andy, I love your patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on rafael-pm/linux-next] [also build test ERROR on nvdimm/libnvdimm-for-next v5.17-rc3 next-20220211] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '

[PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: Switch to use list_entry_is_head() helper

2022-02-11 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Since we got list_entry_is_head() helper in the generic header, we may switch the ACPI modules to use it. This eliminates the need in additional variable. In some cases it reduces critical sections as well. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c | 16 ++-- driver