On Thu, 12 Sept 2024 at 10:11, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 12:17 AM Mike Christie
> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/10/24 10:45 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>> >>> It depends on how we define "secure". There's plenty of users of
>> >>> kthread and if I was not wrong, mike may still need to fix
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 3:02 AM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 11:20:30AM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> > If people are ok with something similar as in this patchset where
> > we have both vhost_tasks and kthreads, then I can send something.
>
>
> It would be better, as you
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 11:20:30AM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> If people are ok with something similar as in this patchset where
> we have both vhost_tasks and kthreads, then I can send something.
It would be better, as you say, to modify the vhost_task code so it can
emulate the kthread behavi
On 9/10/24 2:41 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 10:00:38AM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
>> In commit 6e890c5d5021 ("vhost: use vhost_tasks for worker threads"),
>> vhost removed the support for the kthread API. However, there are
>> still situations where there is a request to use
On 9/10/24 10:45 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> It depends on how we define "secure". There's plenty of users of
>>> kthread and if I was not wrong, mike may still need to fix some bugs.
>>>
>>
>> which bugs?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/06369c2c-c363-4def-9ce0-f018a9e10...@oracle.com/T/
The SIGKIL
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 11:45:33AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 4:43 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 04:37:52PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 3:42 PM Michael S. Tsirkin
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 a
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 4:43 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 04:37:52PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 3:42 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 10:00:38AM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
> > > > In commit 6e890c5d5021 ("vhost: use
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 04:37:52PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 3:42 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 10:00:38AM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
> > > In commit 6e890c5d5021 ("vhost: use vhost_tasks for worker threads"),
> > > vhost removed the support for
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 3:42 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 10:00:38AM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
> > In commit 6e890c5d5021 ("vhost: use vhost_tasks for worker threads"),
> > vhost removed the support for the kthread API. However, there are
> > still situations where there i
On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 10:00:38AM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
> In commit 6e890c5d5021 ("vhost: use vhost_tasks for worker threads"),
> vhost removed the support for the kthread API. However, there are
> still situations where there is a request to use kthread.
> In this PATCH, the support of kthread i
In commit 6e890c5d5021 ("vhost: use vhost_tasks for worker threads"),
vhost removed the support for the kthread API. However, there are
still situations where there is a request to use kthread.
In this PATCH, the support of kthread is added back. Additionally,
a module_param is added to enforce whi
Tested the user application with QEMU.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In commit 6e890c5d5021 ("vhost: use vhost_tasks for worker threads"),
vhost removed the support for the kthread API. However, there are
still situations where there is a
12 matches
Mail list logo
