On 10/11/2019 3:21 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 10:50:35AM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:
On 10/10/2019 8:33 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 04:33:57PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu:
On 10/10/2019 4:00 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 02:46:36
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 10:50:35AM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:
>
>
> On 10/10/2019 8:33 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 04:33:57PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/10/2019 4:00 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 02:46:36PM +0800, Jin
On 10/10/2019 8:33 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 04:33:57PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu:
On 10/10/2019 4:00 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 02:46:36PM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:
On 10/1/2019 10:17 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
I think it's useful. Makes it e
Em Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 04:33:57PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu:
>
>
> On 10/10/2019 4:00 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 02:46:36PM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/1/2019 10:17 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > > > I think it's useful. Makes it easy to do kernel/user br
On 10/10/2019 4:00 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 02:46:36PM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:
On 10/1/2019 10:17 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
I think it's useful. Makes it easy to do kernel/user break downs.
perf record should support the same.
Don't we have this already with:
[root@quaco
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 02:46:36PM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:
>
>
> On 10/1/2019 10:17 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > I think it's useful. Makes it easy to do kernel/user break downs.
> > > > perf record should support the same.
> > >
> > > Don't we have this already with:
> > >
> > > [root@quaco ~]
On 10/1/2019 10:17 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
I think it's useful. Makes it easy to do kernel/user break downs.
perf record should support the same.
Don't we have this already with:
[root@quaco ~]# perf stat -e cycles:u,instructions:u,cycles:k,instructions:k -a
-- sleep 1
This only works for
> > I think it's useful. Makes it easy to do kernel/user break downs.
> > perf record should support the same.
>
> Don't we have this already with:
>
> [root@quaco ~]# perf stat -e cycles:u,instructions:u,cycles:k,instructions:k
> -a -- sleep 1
This only works for simple cases. Try it for --top
Em Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:21:36AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 05:29:13PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:02:16AM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> > > This patch series supports the new options "--all-kernel" and "--all-user"
> > > in perf-stat.
> > > For ex
On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 05:29:13PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:02:16AM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> > This patch series supports the new options "--all-kernel" and "--all-user"
> > in perf-stat.
> >
> > For example,
> >
> > root@kbl:~# perf stat -e cycles,instructions --all-ke
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:02:16AM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> This patch series supports the new options "--all-kernel" and "--all-user"
> in perf-stat.
>
> For example,
>
> root@kbl:~# perf stat -e cycles,instructions --all-kernel --all-user -a --
> sleep 1
>
> Performance counter stats for 'sys
This patch series supports the new options "--all-kernel" and "--all-user"
in perf-stat.
For example,
root@kbl:~# perf stat -e cycles,instructions --all-kernel --all-user -a --
sleep 1
Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
19,156,665 cycles:k
7,265,342 instru
12 matches
Mail list logo
