Hi Jim!
On 2016-09-13 18:55, Baxter, Jim wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
>> nitpick: Patch subjects for the second patch is wrong.
>>
>> "reparented" is a bit dual when dealing with i2c adapter trees.
>> i2c_mux_add_owned_adapter is perhaps clearer?
>
> Agreed, I will update that.
>
>>
>>
>> Aside from th
Hi Peter,
> nitpick: Patch subjects for the second patch is wrong.
>
> "reparented" is a bit dual when dealing with i2c adapter trees.
> i2c_mux_add_owned_adapter is perhaps clearer?
Agreed, I will update that.
>
>
> Aside from that, I'm not using modules much and need some enlightenment
> as to
On 2016-09-07 22:05, jim_bax...@mentor.com wrote:
> From: Jim Baxter
>
> This patchset adds a new i2c_mux_add_reparented_adapter API to the i2c
> that allows owning modules to use module_get/module_put and stop the
> i2c bus module being removed whilst in use.
>
> This was tested on an ARM i.MX6
From: Jim Baxter
This patchset adds a new i2c_mux_add_reparented_adapter API to the i2c
that allows owning modules to use module_get/module_put and stop the
i2c bus module being removed whilst in use.
This was tested on an ARM i.MX6 Sabre board with the pca953x gpio module.
Joshua Frkuska (2):
4 matches
Mail list logo