Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: arm: stm32: lxa,stm32mp157c-mc1: add extra SiP compatible

2020-11-10 Thread Ahmad Fatoum
Hello Rob, On 11/9/20 5:37 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 12:39:31PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: >> I know that bindings and device tree patches should be separate. Does >> this apply here as well? Should I split the dts change into a follow-up >> commit? > > Yes. > >> Is it ok

Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: arm: stm32: lxa,stm32mp157c-mc1: add extra SiP compatible

2020-11-09 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 12:39:31PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > The Linux Automation MC-1 is built around a SIP with CPU, RAM, PMIC, > Oscillator and EEPROM. Add a further compatible identifying the SiP, > so boot firmware can match against it to apply fixups if necessary. > > To avoid intermitten

[PATCH v1] dt-bindings: arm: stm32: lxa,stm32mp157c-mc1: add extra SiP compatible

2020-11-04 Thread Ahmad Fatoum
The Linux Automation MC-1 is built around a SIP with CPU, RAM, PMIC, Oscillator and EEPROM. Add a further compatible identifying the SiP, so boot firmware can match against it to apply fixups if necessary. To avoid intermittent dtbs_check breakage in the sole upstream device tree that uses that Si