On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 04:31:05PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Sorry, but this patch doesn't disable anything. It provides possibility
> to do a custom build with disabled ARM GT driver without Kernel code
> modification - in my case RT-kernel and non-RT Kernel should run on same
> HW and RT
* Grygorii Strashko [160427 06:32]:
> Hi Russell,
>
> On 04/27/2016 01:41 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:35:08PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> >> On 04/26/2016 07:02 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> >>> Well, SoC-B has the GT *and* the DT node, so what is the probl
On 04/27/2016 01:12 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:35:08PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> On 04/26/2016 07:02 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 06:28:52PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Grygorii,
>>>
>>> First time I'm seeing this patch, so I ha
Hi Russell,
On 04/27/2016 01:41 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:35:08PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> On 04/26/2016 07:02 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>>> Well, SoC-B has the GT *and* the DT node, so what is the problem with
>>> enabling it for SoC-B? If there are r
On 04/27/2016 01:15 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 26/04/16 20:35, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> On 04/26/2016 07:02 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 06:28:52PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Grygorii,
>>>
>>> First time I'm seeing this patch, so I have a few questions, mo
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:35:08PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 04/26/2016 07:02 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > Well, SoC-B has the GT *and* the DT node, so what is the problem with
> > enabling it for SoC-B? If there are reasons not to use the Global Timer
> > on SoC-B, surely a better option
On 26/04/16 20:35, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 04/26/2016 07:02 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 06:28:52PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
Hi Grygorii,
First time I'm seeing this patch, so I have a few questions, mostly
related to the commit message:
Hm. You are in cc for RFC.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:35:08PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 04/26/2016 07:02 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 06:28:52PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> >
> > Hi Grygorii,
> >
> > First time I'm seeing this patch, so I have a few questions, mostly
> > related to th
On 04/26/2016 07:02 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 06:28:52PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
> Hi Grygorii,
>
> First time I'm seeing this patch, so I have a few questions, mostly
> related to the commit message:
Hm. You are in cc for RFC.
Sry, forgot to add link [1].
>
>>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 06:28:52PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
Hi Grygorii,
First time I'm seeing this patch, so I have a few questions, mostly
related to the commit message:
> This patch intended to fix following cases:
> - SoC-A has ARM GT, defines DT node for ARM GT and selects
> ARM_GLOB
This patch intended to fix following cases:
- SoC-A has ARM GT, defines DT node for ARM GT and selects
ARM_GLOBAL_TIMER statically in Kconfig file. SoC-B has ARM GT and
defines DT node for ARM GT, but do not selects ARM_GLOBAL_TIMER
statically in Kconfig file. In case of multiplatform build ARM GT
11 matches
Mail list logo