On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 06:49:18PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Whenever there is at least one non-idle CPU, it is necessary to
> periodically update timekeeping information. Before NO_HZ_FULL, this
> updating was carried out by the scheduling-clock tick, which ran on
> every non-i
Hello!
Whenever there is at least one non-idle CPU, it is necessary to
periodically update timekeeping information. Before NO_HZ_FULL, this
updating was carried out by the scheduling-clock tick, which ran on
every non-idle CPU. With the advent of NO_HZ_FULL, it is possible
to have non-idle CPUs
2 matches
Mail list logo
