Thanks again Mike will send out a new version.
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 5:16 AM Mike Christie wrote:
>
> On 5/16/20 6:29 PM, Lance Digby wrote:
> > Mike, Thanks for the review!
> > The pr_err Detected NON_EXISTENT_LUN is the error messages issued
> > for the TCM_NON_EXISTENT_LUN retcode so I b
On 5/16/20 6:29 PM, Lance Digby wrote:
> Mike, Thanks for the review!
> The pr_err Detected NON_EXISTENT_LUN is the error messages issued
> for the TCM_NON_EXISTENT_LUN retcode so I believe they are the same.
> Simply scanning for the wrong lun on an initiator will generate this
> error on th
Mike, Thanks for the review!
The pr_err Detected NON_EXISTENT_LUN is the error messages issued
for the TCM_NON_EXISTENT_LUN retcode so I believe they are the same.
Simply scanning for the wrong lun on an initiator will generate this
error on the target but not generate an error on the initiat
On 5/13/20 11:01 PM, Lance Digby wrote:
> The NON_EXISTENT_LUN error can be written without an error condition
> on the initiator responsible. Adding the initiatorname to this message
> will reduce the effort required to fix this when many initiators are
> supported by a target.
>
> Signed-off-b
The NON_EXISTENT_LUN error can be written without an error condition
on the initiator responsible. Adding the initiatorname to this message
will reduce the effort required to fix this when many initiators are
supported by a target.
Signed-off-by: Lance Digby
---
drivers/target/target_core_devi
5 matches
Mail list logo