>> > Note: This patch is compile tested only. I have done the removal
>> > of buffers from out-queue in handle_control_message()
>> > when host has acked the close request. This seems less
>> > racy than doing it in the release function.
>>
>> This confuses me... why are we doing this in case
>> VI
On (Thu) 08 Nov 2012 [10:28:53], Rusty Russell wrote:
> sjur.brandel...@stericsson.com writes:
>
> > From: Sjur Brændeland
> >
> > Free pending output buffers from the virtio out-queue when
> > host has acknowledged port_close. Also removed WARN_ON()
> > in remove_port_data().
> >
> > Signed-off-
sjur.brandel...@stericsson.com writes:
> From: Sjur Brændeland
>
> Free pending output buffers from the virtio out-queue when
> host has acknowledged port_close. Also removed WARN_ON()
> in remove_port_data().
>
> Signed-off-by: Sjur Brændeland
> ---
>
> Resending, this time including a proper "
From: Sjur Brændeland
Free pending output buffers from the virtio out-queue when
host has acknowledged port_close. Also removed WARN_ON()
in remove_port_data().
Signed-off-by: Sjur Brændeland
---
Resending, this time including a proper "Subject"...
--
Hi Amit,
Note: This patch is compile tes
4 matches
Mail list logo