Re: [PATCH pata-2.6 fix] hpt366: use correct enablebits for HPT36x

2007-07-03 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Tuesday 03 July 2007, Linas Vepstas wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:04:22AM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > The HPT36x chips finally turned out to have the channel enable bits -- > > however, > > badly implemented. Make use of them despite it's probably only going to > > burden

Re: [PATCH pata-2.6 fix] hpt366: use correct enablebits for HPT36x

2007-07-03 Thread Linas Vepstas
Hi, On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:04:22AM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > The HPT36x chips finally turned out to have the channel enable bits -- > however, > badly implemented. Make use of them despite it's probably only going to > burden > the driver's code -- assuming both channels are always en

Re: [PATCH pata-2.6 fix] hpt366: use correct enablebits for HPT36x

2007-06-29 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Friday 29 June 2007, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > The HPT36x chips finally turned out to have the channel enable bits -- > however, > badly implemented. Make use of them despite it's probably only going to > burden > the driver's code -- assuming both channels are always enabled by the > HighPoi

[PATCH pata-2.6 fix] hpt366: use correct enablebits for HPT36x

2007-06-29 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
The HPT36x chips finally turned out to have the channel enable bits -- however, badly implemented. Make use of them despite it's probably only going to burden the driver's code -- assuming both channels are always enabled by the HighPoint BIOS anyway... Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <[EMAIL PROT