Re: [PATCH net-next v3] bindings: net: stmmac: add missing note about LPI interrupt

2017-04-20 Thread Giuseppe CAVALLARO
On 4/18/2017 2:39 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote: From: Niklas Cassel The hardware has a LPI interrupt. There is already code in the stmmac driver to parse and handle the interrupt. However, this information was missing from the DT binding. At the same time, improve the description of the existing in

Re: [PATCH net-next v3] bindings: net: stmmac: add missing note about LPI interrupt

2017-04-20 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 02:39:53PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote: > From: Niklas Cassel > > The hardware has a LPI interrupt. > There is already code in the stmmac driver to parse and handle the > interrupt. However, this information was missing from the DT binding. > > At the same time, improve th

Re: [PATCH net-next v3] bindings: net: stmmac: add missing note about LPI interrupt

2017-04-19 Thread Joao Pinto
Hi Niklas, Às 1:39 PM de 4/18/2017, Niklas Cassel escreveu: > From: Niklas Cassel > > The hardware has a LPI interrupt. > There is already code in the stmmac driver to parse and handle the > interrupt. However, this information was missing from the DT binding. > > At the same time, improve the

[PATCH net-next v3] bindings: net: stmmac: add missing note about LPI interrupt

2017-04-18 Thread Niklas Cassel
From: Niklas Cassel The hardware has a LPI interrupt. There is already code in the stmmac driver to parse and handle the interrupt. However, this information was missing from the DT binding. At the same time, improve the description of the existing interrupts. Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel ---