On 10/15/24, 9:48 AM, "Jakub Kicinski" mailto:k...@kernel.org>> wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 16:22:24 + Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
> Thank you! However, looking at the MAINTAINERS file,
> drivers/connector/ is listed under NETWORKING DRIVERS.
> Hence sending on net-next is the most appropriate p
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 16:22:24 + Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
> Thank you! However, looking at the MAINTAINERS file,
> drivers/connector/ is listed under NETWORKING DRIVERS.
> Hence sending on net-next is the most appropriate place?
Hm. It was done relatively recently in
commit 46cf789b68b25744be3
On 10/15/24, 9:02 AM, "Jakub Kicinski" mailto:k...@kernel.org>> wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 10:06:14 -0700 Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
> However, for threads, when it does a pthread_exit(&exit_status) call, the
> kernel is not aware of the exit status with which pthread_exit is called.
> It is sent
On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 10:06:14 -0700 Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
> However, for threads, when it does a pthread_exit(&exit_status) call, the
> kernel is not aware of the exit status with which pthread_exit is called.
> It is sent by child thread to the parent process, if it is waiting in
> pthread_join().
Recently we committed a fix to allow processes to receive notifications for
non-zero exits via the process connector module. Commit is a4c9a56e6a2c.
However, for threads, when it does a pthread_exit(&exit_status) call, the
kernel is not aware of the exit status with which pthread_exit is called.
I
5 matches
Mail list logo