On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 10:29:03AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 02:16:12 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> > So, the selftest for netpoll is already in the mailing list[1], so, we
> > have two options, now:
> >
> > 1) Steal your patch and make [1] depend on it.
> > 2) Merge the
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 02:16:12 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> So, the selftest for netpoll is already in the mailing list[1], so, we
> have two options, now:
>
> 1) Steal your patch and make [1] depend on it.
> 2) Merge the selftest [1] and, then, steal your patch by adding the
> bpftrace supp
On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 06:51:21AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 01:39:43 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> > > FWIW you can steal bpftrace integration from this series:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250421222827.283737-22-k...@kernel.org/
> >
> > Yes, that would be great. I
On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 01:39:43 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> > FWIW you can steal bpftrace integration from this series:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250421222827.283737-22-k...@kernel.org/
>
> Yes, that would be great. I think we can iterate until we hit the poll
> path, otherwise we skip the
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 05:42:33PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 05:47:50 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> > > Or is there another way that the packets could be observed, e.g.,
> > > counters.
> >
> > Unfortunately netpoll doesn't expose any data, thus, it is hard to get
> > it.
On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 05:47:50 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> > Or is there another way that the packets could be observed, e.g.,
> > counters.
>
> Unfortunately netpoll doesn't expose any data, thus, it is hard to get
> it.
>
> I have plans to create a configfs for netpoll, so, we can check for
>
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 09:43:35AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Breno Leitao wrote:
> > > > +def check_traffic_flowing(cfg: NetDrvEpEnv, netdevnl: NetdevFamily) ->
> > > > int:
> > > > +"""Check if traffic is flowing on the interface"""
> > > > +stat1 = get_stats(cfg, netdevnl)
> > >
Breno Leitao wrote:
> Hello Willem,
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 10:35:54PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > Breno Leitao wrote:
> > > Add a basic selftest for the netpoll polling mechanism, specifically
> > > targeting the netpoll poll() side.
> > >
> > > The test creates a scenario where netwo
Hello Willem,
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 10:35:54PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Breno Leitao wrote:
> > Add a basic selftest for the netpoll polling mechanism, specifically
> > targeting the netpoll poll() side.
> >
> > The test creates a scenario where network transmission is running at
> > ma
Breno Leitao wrote:
> Add a basic selftest for the netpoll polling mechanism, specifically
> targeting the netpoll poll() side.
>
> The test creates a scenario where network transmission is running at
> maximum sppend, and netpoll needs to poll the NIC. This is achieved by:
minor type: sppend/spe
Add a basic selftest for the netpoll polling mechanism, specifically
targeting the netpoll poll() side.
The test creates a scenario where network transmission is running at
maximum sppend, and netpoll needs to poll the NIC. This is achieved by:
1. Configuring a single RX/TX queue to create cont
11 matches
Mail list logo
