Re: [PATCH net-next] wireless: test sscanf return values

On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 10:35 +, David Laight wrote: > From: Joe Perches > > At some point, it'd be good to make sscanf use __must_check > > so make sure the net/ uses of sscanf use the return value. > > Isn't it much safer to avoid sscanf() completely and use > a different function for converti

RE: [PATCH net-next] wireless: test sscanf return values

From: Joe Perches > At some point, it'd be good to make sscanf use __must_check > so make sure the net/ uses of sscanf use the return value. Isn't it much safer to avoid sscanf() completely and use a different function for converting numerics? David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send

[PATCH net-next] wireless: test sscanf return values

At some point, it'd be good to make sscanf use __must_check so make sure the net/ uses of sscanf use the return value. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches --- Compiled, untested. net/mac80211/debugfs.c | 4 ++-- net/wireless/core.c| 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --g