On 2024/9/10 19:27, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
...
>>
>> The main issue I remembered was that it only support x86:(
>>
>
> Yes, because I've added ASM code for reading TSC counter in a very
> precise manor. Given we run many iterations, then I don't think we
> need this precise reading. I gue
On 10/09/2024 12.46, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
On 2024/9/10 1:28, Mina Almasry wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 2:25 AM Yunsheng Lin wrote:
The testing is done by ensuring that the page allocated from
the page_pool instance is pushed into a ptr_ring instance in
a kthread/napi binded to a specified
On 2024/9/10 1:28, Mina Almasry wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 2:25 AM Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>>
>> The testing is done by ensuring that the page allocated from
>> the page_pool instance is pushed into a ptr_ring instance in
>> a kthread/napi binded to a specified cpu, and a kthread/napi
>> binded t
On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 2:25 AM Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>
> The testing is done by ensuring that the page allocated from
> the page_pool instance is pushed into a ptr_ring instance in
> a kthread/napi binded to a specified cpu, and a kthread/napi
> binded to a specified cpu will pop the page from the p
The testing is done by ensuring that the page allocated from
the page_pool instance is pushed into a ptr_ring instance in
a kthread/napi binded to a specified cpu, and a kthread/napi
binded to a specified cpu will pop the page from the ptr_ring
and free it back to the page_pool.
Signed-off-by: Yun
5 matches
Mail list logo
