.kernel.org; David S. Miller
> ; geert+rene...@glider.be; Julia Lawall
> ; Behme, Dirk - Bosch
> ; Eugeniu Rosca
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ravb: Fix bit fields checking in ravb_hwtstamp_get()
>
> Hello!
>
> On 10/19/20 10:32 AM, Andrew Gabbasov wrote:
>
>Sorry
On 9/30/20 10:21 PM, Andrew Gabbasov wrote:
> In the function ravb_hwtstamp_get() in ravb_main.c with the existing
> values for RAVB_RXTSTAMP_TYPE_V2_L2_EVENT (0x2) and RAVB_RXTSTAMP_TYPE_ALL
> (0x6)
>
> if (priv->tstamp_rx_ctrl & RAVB_RXTSTAMP_TYPE_V2_L2_EVENT)
> config.rx_filter = HWTSTAM
Hello!
On 10/19/20 10:32 AM, Andrew Gabbasov wrote:
Sorry for the delay again, I keep forgetting about the mails I' couldn't
reply
quickly. :-|
[...]
>>The patch was set to the "Changes Requested" state -- most probably
>> because of this
>> mail. Though unintentionally, it served to th
. Miller
> ; geert+rene...@glider.be; Julia Lawall
> ; Behme, Dirk - Bosch
> ; Eugeniu Rosca
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ravb: Fix bit fields checking in ravb_hwtstamp_get()
>
> Hello!
>
> On 10/1/20 10:13 AM, Andrew Gabbasov wrote:
>
>The patch was set to the "
Hello!
On 10/1/20 10:13 AM, Andrew Gabbasov wrote:
The patch was set to the "Changes Requested" state -- most probably because
of this
mail. Though unintentionally, it served to throttle actions on this patch. I
did only
remember about this patch yesterday... :-)
[...]
>> In the function ra
a Lawall
> ; Behme, Dirk - Bosch ;
> Eugeniu Rosca ; Gabbasov, Andrew
>
> Subject: [PATCH net] ravb: Fix bit fields checking in ravb_hwtstamp_get()
>
> In the function ravb_hwtstamp_get() in ravb_main.c with the existing
values
> for RAVB_RXTSTAMP_TYPE_V2_L2_EVENT (0x2) and
In the function ravb_hwtstamp_get() in ravb_main.c with the existing
values for RAVB_RXTSTAMP_TYPE_V2_L2_EVENT (0x2) and RAVB_RXTSTAMP_TYPE_ALL
(0x6)
if (priv->tstamp_rx_ctrl & RAVB_RXTSTAMP_TYPE_V2_L2_EVENT)
config.rx_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_EVENT;
else if (priv->tstamp_rx_ctrl
7 matches
Mail list logo