On 09/15/2017 12:25 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14 2017, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>
>> Hi Neil,
>>
>> On 25 August 2017 at 07:32, NeilBrown wrote:
>>>
>>> Expand on the relationship between fstatat() and the other
>>> three functions, and improve the description of AT_NO_AUTOMOUN
On Thu, Sep 14 2017, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> On 25 August 2017 at 07:32, NeilBrown wrote:
>>
>> Expand on the relationship between fstatat() and the other
>> three functions, and improve the description of AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT.
>> Specifically, both stat() and lstat() act th
Hi Neil,
On 25 August 2017 at 07:32, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> Expand on the relationship between fstatat() and the other
> three functions, and improve the description of AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT.
> Specifically, both stat() and lstat() act the same way
> with respect to automounts, and that behavior matches
Expand on the relationship between fstatat() and the other
three functions, and improve the description of AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT.
Specifically, both stat() and lstat() act the same way
with respect to automounts, and that behavior matches
fstatat with the AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT flag.
The text in the NOTES is
4 matches
Mail list logo