> IMO creating a new check_atapi_dma function for first-gen chips would be
> the preferred way to add this check.
A mode filter would be even better, that will mean the list of modes on
the device is correct and ATAPI devices are shown as PIO on such a
controller.
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 20:47:35 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > @@ -789,8 +789,14 @@ static void pdc_exec_command_mmio(struct
> > static int pdc_check_atapi_dma(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
> > {
> > u8 *scsicmd = qc->scsicmd->cmnd;
> > + struct ata_port *ap = qc->ap;
>
Mikael Pettersson wrote:
@@ -789,8 +789,14 @@ static void pdc_exec_command_mmio(struct
static int pdc_check_atapi_dma(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
{
u8 *scsicmd = qc->scsicmd->cmnd;
+ struct ata_port *ap = qc->ap;
+ struct pdc_host_priv *hp = ap->host->private_data;
in
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:32:03 +0100 (MET), Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>This patch adds ATAPI support for the PATA port on Promise 2037x chips.
>It depends on the common sata_promise ATAPI support patch.
>
>First-generation chips don't support ATAPI on their SATA ports, so
>the patch removes ATA_FLAG_NO
This patch adds ATAPI support for the PATA port on Promise 2037x chips.
It depends on the common sata_promise ATAPI support patch.
First-generation chips don't support ATAPI on their SATA ports, so
the patch removes ATA_FLAG_NO_ATAPI from the 2037x common host flags,
and adds it back via the _port
5 matches
Mail list logo
