> On 27. Feb 2025, at 04:17, Alexei Starovoitov
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 6:43 PM Hou Tao wrote:
>>
lookup procedure A
A: find the old element (instead of the new old)
update procedure B
B: delete the old element
Hi,
On 2/27/2025 11:17 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 6:43 PM Hou Tao wrote:
lookup procedure A
A: find the old element (instead of the new old)
update procedure B
B: delete the old element
update pro
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 6:43 PM Hou Tao wrote:
>
> >>
> >> lookup procedure A
> >> A: find the old element (instead of the new old)
> >>
> >> update procedure B
> >> B: delete the old element
> >> update procedure C on the same CPU:
> >> C: r
Hi,
On 2/27/2025 9:59 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 5:48 PM Hou Tao wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2/27/2025 7:17 AM, Zvi Effron wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 9:42 PM Alexei Starovoitov
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 8:05 PM Hou Tao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> O
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 5:48 PM Hou Tao wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2/27/2025 7:17 AM, Zvi Effron wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 9:42 PM Alexei Starovoitov
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 8:05 PM Hou Tao wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On 2/26/2025 11:24 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> O
Hi,
On 2/27/2025 7:17 AM, Zvi Effron wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 9:42 PM Alexei Starovoitov
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 8:05 PM Hou Tao wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 2/26/2025 11:24 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 2:17 AM Hou Tao wrote:
> Hi Toke,
>
>>
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 9:42 PM Alexei Starovoitov
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 8:05 PM Hou Tao wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2/26/2025 11:24 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 2:17 AM Hou Tao wrote:
> > >> Hi Toke,
> > >>
> > >> On 2/6/2025 11:05 PM, Toke Høiland-J
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 8:05 PM Hou Tao wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2/26/2025 11:24 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 2:17 AM Hou Tao wrote:
> >> Hi Toke,
> >>
> >> On 2/6/2025 11:05 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> >>> Hou Tao writes:
> >>>
> +cc Cody Haas
>
>
Hi,
On 2/26/2025 11:24 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 2:17 AM Hou Tao wrote:
>> Hi Toke,
>>
>> On 2/6/2025 11:05 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>> Hou Tao writes:
>>>
+cc Cody Haas
Sorry for the resend. I sent the reply in the HTML format.
On
On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 2:17 AM Hou Tao wrote:
>
> Hi Toke,
>
> On 2/6/2025 11:05 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > Hou Tao writes:
> >
> >> +cc Cody Haas
> >>
> >> Sorry for the resend. I sent the reply in the HTML format.
> >>
> >> On 2/4/2025 4:28 PM, Hou Tao wrote:
> >>> Currently, the upd
Hi Toke,
On 2/6/2025 11:05 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Hou Tao writes:
>
>> +cc Cody Haas
>>
>> Sorry for the resend. I sent the reply in the HTML format.
>>
>> On 2/4/2025 4:28 PM, Hou Tao wrote:
>>> Currently, the update of existing element in hash map involves two
>>> steps:
>>> 1) ins
Hou Tao writes:
> +cc Cody Haas
>
> Sorry for the resend. I sent the reply in the HTML format.
>
> On 2/4/2025 4:28 PM, Hou Tao wrote:
>> Currently, the update of existing element in hash map involves two
>> steps:
>> 1) insert the new element at the head of the hash list
>> 2) remove the old ele
+cc Cody Haas
Sorry for the resend. I sent the reply in the HTML format.
On 2/4/2025 4:28 PM, Hou Tao wrote:
> Currently, the update of existing element in hash map involves two
> steps:
> 1) insert the new element at the head of the hash list
> 2) remove the old element
>
> It is possible that
Currently, the update of existing element in hash map involves two
steps:
1) insert the new element at the head of the hash list
2) remove the old element
It is possible that the concurrent lookup operation may fail to find
either the old element or the new element if the lookup operation starts
b
14 matches
Mail list logo
