On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 15:30 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > I think it's better to centralize the MAINTAINERS
> > location in /MAINTAINERS/ than spread
> > them all over the tree given how many subsystems and
> > maintainerships are also
On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 15:30 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So we'd have files like "rdma", "dma", "omap", "pm", "dri", "pci",
> "wireless" etc, all of which sound sane.
[]
> it looks like a promising approach to me, and I like how
> the names seem to end up all fairly sane.
>
> Comments?
Seems so
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> I think it's better to centralize the MAINTAINERS
> location in /MAINTAINERS/ than spread
> them all over the tree given how many subsystems and
> maintainerships are also spread around the tree.
>
> But the get_maintainers patch I sent allow
On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 19:43 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > Maybe add a reordering of the patterns so that each pattern list
> > is in a specific order too
>
> I don't think this is wrong per se, but I'm not sure I want to get
> into the
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> Maybe add a reordering of the patterns so that each pattern list
> is in a specific order too
I don't think this is wrong per se, but I'm not sure I want to get
into the merge hell any more than we are already.
Maybe when/if that file is ac
On Sun, 2017-07-23 at 16:14 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, clearly my script showed something. I think my script is still
> > doing the right thing, it's just that the input is questionable.
>
> I added a few actual checks
On Sun, 2017-07-23 at 16:14 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, clearly my script showed something. I think my script is still
> > doing the right thing, it's just that the input is questionable.
>
> I added a few actual checks
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> Anyway, clearly my script showed something. I think my script is still
> doing the right thing, it's just that the input is questionable.
I added a few actual checks for the error cases to the script, fixed
up the problems, and committed
On Sun, 2017-07-23 at 13:00 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> it looks like there were four copies of "GREYBUS PROTOCOLS
> DRIVERS". WTF? I didn't check if there was something else odd going
> on.
>
> I guess they'd need to be made unique somehow too.
right.
Unfortunate about the duplicate section
On Sun, 2017-07-23 at 12:49 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Ok, so I already applied your alpha-ordering patch, but it just annoyed me
> that
>
> (a) the ordering wasn't complete
>
> (b) this wasn't scripted.
>
> However, the sane way of scripting it is clearly not to do it in C,
> which I'd b
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> The end result looks ok. I can run
>
> perl parse-maintainers.pl < MAINTAINERS > outfile
>
> and the end result is actually a *properly* sorted MAINTAINERS file as
> far as I can tell.
Yeah, there's something wrong there. I end up wi
Ok, so I already applied your alpha-ordering patch, but it just annoyed me that
(a) the ordering wasn't complete
(b) this wasn't scripted.
However, the sane way of scripting it is clearly not to do it in C,
which I'd be comfy with, because that would be insane.
Instead, it should be done in p
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> and send with correct file encoding!
Congratulations, you were indeed successful in fixing whatever locale
issue that was biting you.
Linus
From: Randy Dunlap
Fix major alphabetic errors. No attempt to fix items that all begin
with the same word (like ARM, BROADCOM, DRM, EDAC, FREESCALE, INTEL,
OMAP, PCI, SAMSUNG, TI, USB, etc.).
(diffstat +/- is different by one line because TI KEYSTONE MULTICORE
had 2 blank lines after it.)
Signe
14 matches
Mail list logo