On Wed, 07 Aug 2013 11:13:23 +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 07/08/13 09:44, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> Things like this likely being ended up with typo. How about this? (not
>> tested)
>
> And yet there aren't any typos.
Yes, but there's a possibility of adding one later. I have a memory
that whe
On 07/08/13 09:44, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 19:26:21 +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> It is useful to see the arguments to perf_event_open
>> and whether the perf events ring buffer was mmapped
>> per-cpu or per-thread. That information will now be
>> displayed when
Hi Adrian,
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 19:26:21 +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> It is useful to see the arguments to perf_event_open
> and whether the perf events ring buffer was mmapped
> per-cpu or per-thread. That information will now be
> displayed when verbose is 2 i.e option -vv
>
[SNIP]
>
> +stati
It is useful to see the arguments to perf_event_open
and whether the perf events ring buffer was mmapped
per-cpu or per-thread. That information will now be
displayed when verbose is 2 i.e option -vv
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter
---
tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 3 +++
tools/perf/util/evsel.c |
4 matches
Mail list logo