On 01/10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 09-01-18, 18:54, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > My read of Kevin's comments lead me to think he's saying that a
> > generic 'domain-performance-state' property is worse than putting
> > the numbers directly inside of the opp table with a comment above
> > it. Now that's
On 09-01-18, 18:54, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> My read of Kevin's comments lead me to think he's saying that a
> generic 'domain-performance-state' property is worse than putting
> the numbers directly inside of the opp table with a comment above
> it. Now that's all fine, but now that we have required-
On 01/08, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 05-01-18, 14:19, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 12/29, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> > Could you please point to Kevin's comments and also include the
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/m2r30i4w35@baylibre.com
Ok. That thread was months ago. Shocked I can't remember!
My
On 05-01-18, 14:19, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 12/29, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Could you please point to Kevin's comments and also include the
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/m2r30i4w35@baylibre.com
> reasoning behind magic values in the commit text for the patch?
> It would be very helpful to know why
On 12/29, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 28-12-17, 16:32, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 12/28, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> > > So what we need now is:
> > >
> > > - Stephen to start responding and clarify all the doubts he had as being
> > > silent
> > > isn't helping.
> >
> > What can I reply to specific
On 02-01-18, 11:35, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> I would want to reiterate what I have been saying for a while, that for these
> patches
> to be usable on any qualcomm platform completely we need support to associate
> multiple power-domains to a single device which is missing today.
Sure, but I had t
On 12/28/2017 10:07 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 27-12-17, 15:54, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 2:56 AM, Viresh Kumar
>> wrote:
>>> On 26-12-17, 14:29, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 03:51:30PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>>
> +On some platforms the exact fr
On 28-12-17, 16:32, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 12/28, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > So what we need now is:
> >
> > - Stephen to start responding and clarify all the doubts he had as being
> > silent
> > isn't helping.
>
> What can I reply to specifically?
I explained in detail how this stuff is goi
On 12/28, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 27-12-17, 15:54, Rob Herring wrote:
> >
> > I don't really know. I don't really care either. I'll probably go
> > along with what everyone agrees to, but the only one I see any
> > agreement from is Ulf. Also, it is pretty vague as to what platforms
> > will use
On 27-12-17, 15:54, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 2:56 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 26-12-17, 14:29, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 03:51:30PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >
> >> > +On some platforms the exact frequency or voltage may be hidden from the
> >> > OS
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 2:56 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 26-12-17, 14:29, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 03:51:30PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
>> > +On some platforms the exact frequency or voltage may be hidden from the
>> > OS by
>> > +the firmware and the "opp-hz" or the "opp
On 26-12-17, 14:29, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 03:51:30PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > +On some platforms the exact frequency or voltage may be hidden from the OS
> > by
> > +the firmware and the "opp-hz" or the "opp-microvolt" properties may contain
> > +magic values that rep
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 03:51:30PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On some platforms the exact frequency or voltage may be hidden from the
> OS by the firmware. Allow such configurations to pass magic values in
> the "opp-hz" or the "opp-microvolt" properties, which should be
> interpreted in a platfo
On some platforms the exact frequency or voltage may be hidden from the
OS by the firmware. Allow such configurations to pass magic values in
the "opp-hz" or the "opp-microvolt" properties, which should be
interpreted in a platform dependent way.
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kum
14 matches
Mail list logo
