Hi Peter,
On 9/17/2018 1:58 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 10:14:36AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> +static int measure_l2_residency(void *_plr)
>> +{
>
>> +measure_residency_fn(&perf_miss_attr, &perf_hit_attr, plr, &counts);
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int measure_l3_res
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 10:14:36AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> +static int measure_l2_residency(void *_plr)
> +{
> + measure_residency_fn(&perf_miss_attr, &perf_hit_attr, plr, &counts);
> +}
> +
> +static int measure_l3_residency(void *_plr)
> +{
> + measure_residency_fn(&perf_miss_a
The success of a cache pseudo-locked region is measured using
performance monitoring events that are programmed directly at the time
the user requests a measurement.
Modifying the performance event registers directly is not appropriate
since it circumvents the in-kernel perf infrastructure that ex
3 matches
Mail list logo
