On 12/07/2012 02:51 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> I've only now bumped into the patchset (working the back log on linux-arm).
> Sorry for late reply, but I guess you should have Cc'd the relevant
> mailing lists with such changes.
> Cc'd now.
Perhaps. There's a trade-off with spammin
Hi Stephen,
I've only now bumped into the patchset (working the back log on linux-arm).
Sorry for late reply, but I guess you should have Cc'd the relevant
mailing lists with such changes.
Cc'd now.
On 11/19/12 20:31, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren
>
> Now that the only field in s
On 11/20/2012 09:43 PM, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:31 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> From: Stephen Warren
>>
>> Now that the only field in struct sys_timer is .init, delete the struct,
>> and replace the machine descriptor .timer field with the initialization
>> function itse
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:31 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren
>
> Now that the only field in struct sys_timer is .init, delete the struct,
> and replace the machine descriptor .timer field with the initialization
> function itself.
>
> This will enable moving timer drivers into dr
From: Stephen Warren
Now that the only field in struct sys_timer is .init, delete the struct,
and replace the machine descriptor .timer field with the initialization
function itself.
This will enable moving timer drivers into drivers/clocksource without
having to place a public prototype of each
5 matches
Mail list logo