Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] cpufreq: handle calls to ->target_index() in separate routine

2014-05-20 Thread Doug Anderson
Viresh, On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Handling calls to ->target_index() has got complex over time and might become > more complex. So, its better to take target_index() bits out in another > routine > __target_index() for better code readability. Shouldn't have any func

[PATCH V3 1/4] cpufreq: handle calls to ->target_index() in separate routine

2014-05-16 Thread Viresh Kumar
Handling calls to ->target_index() has got complex over time and might become more complex. So, its better to take target_index() bits out in another routine __target_index() for better code readability. Shouldn't have any functional impact. Tested-by: Stephen Warren Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar