Hi Bjorn,
On Saturday 18 February 2017 01:21 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 07:33:15AM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>> Dear Bjorn,
>>
>> On 02/16/2017 06:11 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 05:26:09PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
This patcheset is for usi
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 07:33:15AM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Dear Bjorn,
>
> On 02/16/2017 06:11 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 05:26:09PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> >> This patcheset is for using PHY generic framework.
> >> Current pci-exyns doesn't use the phy framew
Dear Bjorn,
On 02/16/2017 06:11 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 05:26:09PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>> This patcheset is for using PHY generic framework.
>> Current pci-exyns doesn't use the phy framework since there haven't been on
>> PHY subsystem when Exynos5440 had bean u
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 05:26:09PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> This patcheset is for using PHY generic framework.
> Current pci-exyns doesn't use the phy framework since there haven't been on
> PHY subsystem when Exynos5440 had bean upstreamed.
> It's making a difficult to upstream the other Exyn
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 05:26:09PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> This patcheset is for using PHY generic framework.
> Current pci-exyns doesn't use the phy framework since there haven't been on
> PHY subsystem when Exynos5440 had bean upstreamed.
> It's making a difficult to upstream the other Exyn
This patcheset is for using PHY generic framework.
Current pci-exyns doesn't use the phy framework since there haven't been on
PHY subsystem when Exynos5440 had bean upstreamed.
It's making a difficult to upstream the other Exynos variants because of
different
PHY registers.
This patcheset has th
6 matches
Mail list logo