On 03-02-16, 19:32, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> We used to drop policy->rwsem just before calling __cpufreq_governor()
> in some cases earlier and so it was possible that __cpufreq_governor()
> runs concurrently via separate threads.
>
> In order to guarantee valid state transitions for governors,
> 'go
We used to drop policy->rwsem just before calling __cpufreq_governor()
in some cases earlier and so it was possible that __cpufreq_governor()
runs concurrently via separate threads.
In order to guarantee valid state transitions for governors,
'governor_enabled' was required to be protected using s
2 matches
Mail list logo
