Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] Documetation: binding: modify the exynos5440 pcie binding

2017-01-09 Thread Alim Akhtar
Hi Jaehoon, On 01/04/2017 06:04 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote: According to using PHY framework, updates the exynos5440-pcie binding. For maintaining backward compatibility, leaves the current dt-binding. (It should be deprecated.) Recommends to use the Phy Framework and "config" property to follow t

Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] Documetation: binding: modify the exynos5440 pcie binding

2017-01-04 Thread pankaj.dubey
Hi Jaehoon, On Wednesday 04 January 2017 06:04 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > According to using PHY framework, updates the exynos5440-pcie binding. > For maintaining backward compatibility, leaves the current dt-binding. > (It should be deprecated.) > > Recommends to use the Phy Framework and "confi

Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] Documetation: binding: modify the exynos5440 pcie binding

2017-01-04 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:34:33PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > According to using PHY framework, updates the exynos5440-pcie binding. > For maintaining backward compatibility, leaves the current dt-binding. > (It should be deprecated.) > > Recommends to use the Phy Framework and "config" propert

[PATCH V2 3/5] Documetation: binding: modify the exynos5440 pcie binding

2017-01-04 Thread Jaehoon Chung
According to using PHY framework, updates the exynos5440-pcie binding. For maintaining backward compatibility, leaves the current dt-binding. (It should be deprecated.) Recommends to use the Phy Framework and "config" property to follow the designware-pcie binding. If you use the old way, can see