Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] sched: Move idle_stamp up to the core

2014-02-13 Thread Preeti U Murthy
Hi Daniel, On 02/11/2014 05:37 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 02/10/2014 11:04 AM, Preeti Murthy wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Daniel Lezcano >> wrote: >>> The idle_balance modifies the idle_stamp field of the rq, making this >>> information to be shared across core.c

Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] sched: Move idle_stamp up to the core

2014-02-12 Thread Alex Shi
On 02/07/2014 07:10 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > The idle_balance modifies the idle_stamp field of the rq, making this > information to be shared across core.c and fair.c. As we can know if the > cpu is going to idle or not with the previous patch, let's encapsulate the > idle_stamp information in c

Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] sched: Move idle_stamp up to the core

2014-02-11 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 02/10/2014 11:04 AM, Preeti Murthy wrote: Hi Daniel, On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: The idle_balance modifies the idle_stamp field of the rq, making this information to be shared across core.c and fair.c. As we can know if the cpu is going to idle or not with the prev

Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] sched: Move idle_stamp up to the core

2014-02-10 Thread Preeti Murthy
Hi Daniel, On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > The idle_balance modifies the idle_stamp field of the rq, making this > information to be shared across core.c and fair.c. As we can know if the > cpu is going to idle or not with the previous patch, let's encapsulate the > idle_s

[PATCH V2 3/3] sched: Move idle_stamp up to the core

2014-02-06 Thread Daniel Lezcano
The idle_balance modifies the idle_stamp field of the rq, making this information to be shared across core.c and fair.c. As we can know if the cpu is going to idle or not with the previous patch, let's encapsulate the idle_stamp information in core.c by moving it up to the caller. The idle_balance