On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 1:41 PM Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:04 PM Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >
> > Hi Peter and Kan,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:25 PM Peter Zijlstra
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 08:52:55AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
> > > >
> > >
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:04 PM Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> Hi Peter and Kan,
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:25 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 08:52:55AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/10/2020 2:13 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > > Hi Peter and Kan,
> >
Hi Peter and Kan,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:25 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 08:52:55AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/10/2020 2:13 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > Hi Peter and Kan,
> > >
> > > How can we move this forward?
> >
> > Hi Namhyung,
> >
> > Thanks for
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 08:52:55AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
>
> On 12/10/2020 2:13 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Hi Peter and Kan,
> >
> > How can we move this forward?
>
> Hi Namhyung,
>
> Thanks for the test. The changes look good to me.
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> Should we resend the patch set for
On 12/10/2020 2:13 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Peter and Kan,
How can we move this forward?
Hi Namhyung,
Thanks for the test. The changes look good to me.
Hi Peter,
Should we resend the patch set for further review?
Thanks,
Kan
Thanks,
Namhyung
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 4:14 PM Namhyu
Hi Peter and Kan,
How can we move this forward?
Thanks,
Namhyung
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 4:14 PM Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 2:29 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:38:42AM -0800, kan.li...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Kan Liang
>
Hi Peter,
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 2:29 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:38:42AM -0800, kan.li...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Kan Liang
> >
> > Some calls to sched_task() in a context switch can be avoided. For
> > example, large PEBS only requires flushing the buffer i
Hi Peter and Kan,
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 06:29:03PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:38:42AM -0800, kan.li...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Kan Liang
> >
> > Some calls to sched_task() in a context switch can be avoided. For
> > example, large PEBS only requires flus
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 06:29:03PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +static void context_sched_task(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
> +struct perf_event_context *ctx,
> +bool sched_in)
> +{
> + struct pmu *pmu = ctx->pmu;
> +
> + if (cp
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:38:42AM -0800, kan.li...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang
>
> Some calls to sched_task() in a context switch can be avoided. For
> example, large PEBS only requires flushing the buffer in context switch
> out. The current code still invokes the sched_task() for
From: Kan Liang
Some calls to sched_task() in a context switch can be avoided. For
example, large PEBS only requires flushing the buffer in context switch
out. The current code still invokes the sched_task() for large PEBS in
context switch in.
The current code doesn't know and check the states
11 matches
Mail list logo
