Re: [PATCH V2 00/19] virtio_ring in order support

On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 8:51 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 02:42:15PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > Hello all: > > > > This sereis tries to implement the VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER to > > virtio_ring. This is done by introducing virtqueue ops so we can > > implement separate helpe

Re: [PATCH V2 00/19] virtio_ring in order support

On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 02:42:15PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Hello all: > > This sereis tries to implement the VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER to > virtio_ring. This is done by introducing virtqueue ops so we can > implement separate helpers for different virtqueue layout/features > then the in-order were impl

Re: [PATCH V2 00/19] virtio_ring in order support

On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 8:42 AM Jason Wang wrote: > > Hello all: > > This sereis tries to implement the VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER to > virtio_ring. This is done by introducing virtqueue ops so we can > implement separate helpers for different virtqueue layout/features > then the in-order were implemented

[PATCH V2 00/19] virtio_ring in order support

Hello all: This sereis tries to implement the VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER to virtio_ring. This is done by introducing virtqueue ops so we can implement separate helpers for different virtqueue layout/features then the in-order were implemented on top. Tests shows 3%-5% imporvment with packed virtqueue PPS