On 28-10-20, 12:31, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 28/10/2020 04:11, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > When do we fail if the frequency isn't known ? That's the case where
> > we try to set it to one from the table.
>
> Currently, if the frequency is not known, we fail right before we do the
> initial frequency che
On 26-10-20, 12:57, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Thinking about this some more, what are your thoughts on making the
> following change?
>
> Basically, if the driver sets the CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK,
This flag only means that the platform would like the core to check
the currently programmed freq
On 28/10/2020 04:11, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 26-10-20, 12:57, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Thinking about this some more, what are your thoughts on making the
>> following change?
>>
>> Basically, if the driver sets the CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK,
>
> This flag only means that the platform would
On 19/10/2020 10:33, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 16/10/2020 05:07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 15-10-20, 15:03, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> If not too late, would you mind dropping this patch for v5.10?
>>
>> It is already part of Linus's master now.
>
> OK, thanks. I will send a revert for this once rc1
On 16/10/2020 05:07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 15-10-20, 15:03, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> If not too late, would you mind dropping this patch for v5.10?
>
> It is already part of Linus's master now.
OK, thanks. I will send a revert for this once rc1 is out.
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
On 15-10-20, 15:03, Jon Hunter wrote:
> If not too late, would you mind dropping this patch for v5.10?
It is already part of Linus's master now.
--
viresh
Hi Viresh,
On 25/08/2020 06:50, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24-08-20, 15:59, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Commit 6cc3d0e9a097 ("cpufreq: tegra186: add
>> CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK flag") fixed CPUFREQ support for
>> Tegra186 but as a consequence the following warnings are now seen on
>> boot ...
>>
>>
On 25/08/2020 06:50, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24-08-20, 15:59, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Commit 6cc3d0e9a097 ("cpufreq: tegra186: add
>> CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK flag") fixed CPUFREQ support for
>> Tegra186 but as a consequence the following warnings are now seen on
>> boot ...
>>
>> cpufreq:
On 24-08-20, 15:59, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Commit 6cc3d0e9a097 ("cpufreq: tegra186: add
> CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK flag") fixed CPUFREQ support for
> Tegra186 but as a consequence the following warnings are now seen on
> boot ...
>
> cpufreq: cpufreq_online: CPU0: Running at unlisted freq: 0
Commit 6cc3d0e9a097 ("cpufreq: tegra186: add
CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK flag") fixed CPUFREQ support for
Tegra186 but as a consequence the following warnings are now seen on
boot ...
cpufreq: cpufreq_online: CPU0: Running at unlisted freq: 0 KHz
cpufreq: cpufreq_online: CPU0: Unlisted initi
10 matches
Mail list logo