On 07/31/12 12:11, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 12:00 -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
>
>>> Yeah, my root fs is on the sdcard. Did you get this bug every time or
>>> was it sporadic?
>>
>> I get it every boot.
>
> Can you try it with an SD card? I can set it up for nfs as well, but
>
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 12:00 -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> > Yeah, my root fs is on the sdcard. Did you get this bug every time or
> > was it sporadic?
>
> I get it every boot.
Can you try it with an SD card? I can set it up for nfs as well, but
that would take a bit of time.
-- Steve
--
To uns
On 07/30/12 19:32, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 19:22 -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 07/30/12 18:22, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 17:15 -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>>
Config is from arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig
plus:
CONFIG_U
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 19:22 -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 07/30/12 18:22, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 17:15 -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Config is from arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig
> >> plus:
> >>
> >>CONFIG_USB_EHCI_HCD=y
> >>CONFIG_USB_NET_SMSC95
On 07/30/12 18:22, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 17:15 -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
>
>>
>> Config is from arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig
>> plus:
>>
>>CONFIG_USB_EHCI_HCD=y
>>CONFIG_USB_NET_SMSC95XX=y
>>CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL=y
>>
>
> Interesting, I just booted my
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 17:15 -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> Config is from arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig
> plus:
>
>CONFIG_USB_EHCI_HCD=y
>CONFIG_USB_NET_SMSC95XX=y
>CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL=y
>
Interesting, I just booted my panda board against 3.0.36-rt58 with that
config and
On 07/18/12 15:39, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner
>
> On RT we avoid the cross cpu function calls and take the per cpu local
> locks instead. Now the code missed that taking the local lock on the
> cpu which runs the code must use the proper local lock functions and
> not a simple
From: Thomas Gleixner
On RT we avoid the cross cpu function calls and take the per cpu local
locks instead. Now the code missed that taking the local lock on the
cpu which runs the code must use the proper local lock functions and
not a simple spin_lock(). Otherwise it deadlocks later when trying
From: Thomas Gleixner
On RT we avoid the cross cpu function calls and take the per cpu local
locks instead. Now the code missed that taking the local lock on the
cpu which runs the code must use the proper local lock functions and
not a simple spin_lock(). Otherwise it deadlocks later when trying
9 matches
Mail list logo