On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 12:52:00PM -0500, Clark Williams wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:43:48PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 12:36 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 08, 20
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:43:48PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 12:36 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:27:08AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
The first time I compiled i
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:43:48PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 12:36 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:27:08AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > > The first time I compiled it, I forgot the ';' and got a warning there.
> > > But the warning als
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 12:36 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:27:08AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > The first time I compiled it, I forgot the ';' and got a warning there.
> > But the warning also included "declaring structure softirq_action in
> > prototype", so I fix
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:27:08AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 14:02 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > Some nits below.
> >
> > Thanx, Paul
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > Index: linu
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 14:02 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Some nits below.
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.21-rt9/include/linux/rcupreempt.h
> >
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:16:51PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:16:09PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 14:51 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > > There might still be an issue here. With the patch I'm getting a really
> > > slow response tim
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:16:09PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 14:51 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > There might still be an issue here. With the patch I'm getting a really
> > slow response time on networking. But that be because of other patches I
> > have applied.
>
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 02:26:59PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Following Dipankar's lead, I converted the tasklet in rcupreempt.c into
> a softirq.
>
> I've compiled and booted with this patch, but ran no other tests.
I should be able to run rcutorture on it.
> Paul, I'm disappointed, this w
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 14:51 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> There might still be an issue here. With the patch I'm getting a really
> slow response time on networking. But that be because of other patches I
> have applied.
I removed this patch and I can still get the network slowdown/hang. So
this
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 14:26 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Following Dipankar's lead, I converted the tasklet in rcupreempt.c into
> a softirq.
>
> I've compiled and booted with this patch, but ran no other tests.
There might still be an issue here. With the patch I'm getting a really
slow respo
Following Dipankar's lead, I converted the tasklet in rcupreempt.c into
a softirq.
I've compiled and booted with this patch, but ran no other tests.
Paul, I'm disappointed, this was so trivial I didn't get a chance to
learn anything ;-)
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index:
12 matches
Mail list logo